Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:23:45 10/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2005 at 19:27:53, Tom Likens wrote: >On October 31, 2005 at 12:40:07, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >[--snip--] > >>This logic is flawed. This says that the _only_ person that can critique a >>program is a person that has written a program that is as good or better. In >>the world of hot-rodding, I can tell someone if they have too much carburetor on >>their V-8 even if I can't beat 'em... And I can be 100% correct when I tell >>them that... >> >>I'd say conventional wisdom goes with Uri here. One can over-extend. And it >>might well be that Fruit would be even stronger if the extensions were tuned a >>bit. >> >>forward-pruning compensates for over-extending somewhat. But extending too much >>is just as bad as extending too little... > >Bob, > >Fess up, when's your next Nascar race!? I'm guessing you'll be driving >some 512-CPU Numa-powered dragster!! ;-) Cut away to "Tool Time" and Tim is shouting: "MORE POWER!!"
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.