Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:09:57 11/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2005 at 04:59:32, Ryan B. wrote: >On November 01, 2005 at 04:38:38, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>>My vote goes to hiarcs, but junior and chessmaster, (I think) is a close second. >> >>My vote goes to: >> >>Hydra >>Jonior >>Rebel >>Quark >>Crafty >> >>And i suspect Fruit with it's more positional style would be right up there. > >I beat Fruit 2.2 more often than I beat Prodeo. In the human world of chess it >takes a lot more than a few mobility factors and placing pieces in the center to >have a positional style. Fruit is a very good engine but it is better at >beating computers than humans in my experiance. > >Ryan Maybe it is because fruit2.1 is open source so after reading the source you know the weaknesses of it(no change from fruit2.1 to fruit2.2 in evaluation except bonus for the side to move). Maybe if Ed release the source of his evaluation function you will also be able to beat prodeo. If you think that prodeo has better positional understanding than fruit then it may be productive if you give examples for these positions. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.