Author: Mark R. Anderson
Date: 03:04:18 11/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2005 at 05:44:57, Swaminathan wrote: >On November 01, 2005 at 05:09:57, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 01, 2005 at 04:59:32, Ryan B. wrote: >> >>>On November 01, 2005 at 04:38:38, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>>My vote goes to hiarcs, but junior and chessmaster, (I think) is a close second. >>>> >>>>My vote goes to: >>>> >>>>Hydra >>>>Jonior >>>>Rebel >>>>Quark >>>>Crafty >>>> >>>>And i suspect Fruit with it's more positional style would be right up there. >>> >>>I beat Fruit 2.2 more often than I beat Prodeo. In the human world of chess it >>>takes a lot more than a few mobility factors and placing pieces in the center to >>>have a positional style. Fruit is a very good engine but it is better at >>>beating computers than humans in my experiance. >>> >>>Ryan >> >>Maybe it is because fruit2.1 is open source so after reading the source you know >>the weaknesses of it(no change from fruit2.1 to fruit2.2 in evaluation except >>bonus for the side to move). > >How do you know he is a programmer? > >>Uri He programmed Movei. (Read his profile.) Mark
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.