Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:10:54 11/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2005 at 06:04:18, Mark R. Anderson wrote: >On November 01, 2005 at 05:44:57, Swaminathan wrote: > >>On November 01, 2005 at 05:09:57, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 01, 2005 at 04:59:32, Ryan B. wrote: >>> >>>>On November 01, 2005 at 04:38:38, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>> >>>>>>My vote goes to hiarcs, but junior and chessmaster, (I think) is a close second. >>>>> >>>>>My vote goes to: >>>>> >>>>>Hydra >>>>>Jonior >>>>>Rebel >>>>>Quark >>>>>Crafty >>>>> >>>>>And i suspect Fruit with it's more positional style would be right up there. >>>> >>>>I beat Fruit 2.2 more often than I beat Prodeo. In the human world of chess it >>>>takes a lot more than a few mobility factors and placing pieces in the center to >>>>have a positional style. Fruit is a very good engine but it is better at >>>>beating computers than humans in my experiance. >>>> >>>>Ryan >>> >>>Maybe it is because fruit2.1 is open source so after reading the source you know >>>the weaknesses of it(no change from fruit2.1 to fruit2.2 in evaluation except >>>bonus for the side to move). >> >>How do you know he is a programmer? >> >>>Uri > >He programmed Movei. (Read his profile.) > >Mark I think the poster meant to Ryan and not to me. Note that Ryan talk about fruit's evaluation and said that it is simple so I suppose that he read the source. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.