Author: Swaminathan
Date: 03:16:58 11/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2005 at 06:10:54, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 01, 2005 at 06:04:18, Mark R. Anderson wrote: > >>On November 01, 2005 at 05:44:57, Swaminathan wrote: >> >>>On November 01, 2005 at 05:09:57, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On November 01, 2005 at 04:59:32, Ryan B. wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 01, 2005 at 04:38:38, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>My vote goes to hiarcs, but junior and chessmaster, (I think) is a close second. >>>>>> >>>>>>My vote goes to: >>>>>> >>>>>>Hydra >>>>>>Jonior >>>>>>Rebel >>>>>>Quark >>>>>>Crafty >>>>>> >>>>>>And i suspect Fruit with it's more positional style would be right up there. >>>>> >>>>>I beat Fruit 2.2 more often than I beat Prodeo. In the human world of chess it >>>>>takes a lot more than a few mobility factors and placing pieces in the center to >>>>>have a positional style. Fruit is a very good engine but it is better at >>>>>beating computers than humans in my experiance. >>>>> >>>>>Ryan >>>> >>>>Maybe it is because fruit2.1 is open source so after reading the source you know >>>>the weaknesses of it(no change from fruit2.1 to fruit2.2 in evaluation except >>>>bonus for the side to move). >>> >>>How do you know he is a programmer? >>> >>>>Uri >> >>He programmed Movei. (Read his profile.) >> >>Mark > >I think the poster meant to Ryan and not to me. >Note that Ryan talk about fruit's evaluation and said that it is simple so I >suppose that he read the source. Maybe he saw Fruit's line for player's move too.Fruit always sticks with one move for analysis,very rarely changes to other moves whereas other programs changes analysis lines too often. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.