Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 08:34:55 11/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2005 at 04:59:32, Ryan B. wrote: >On November 01, 2005 at 04:38:38, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>>My vote goes to hiarcs, but junior and chessmaster, (I think) is a close second. >> >>My vote goes to: >> >>Hydra >>Jonior >>Rebel >>Quark >>Crafty >> >>And i suspect Fruit with it's more positional style would be right up there. > >I beat Fruit 2.2 more often than I beat Prodeo. In the human world of chess it >takes a lot more than a few mobility factors and placing pieces in the center to >have a positional style. Fruit is a very good engine but it is better at >beating computers than humans in my experiance. > >Ryan I saw Fruit 2.2 weak on this type of position : - Fruit doesn't understand when opponent building a forced mate - Fruit sometimes push a pawn too far, unprotectable and will be lost by force and get a lost endgame - Fruit understimate far passed pawns who can go queening by forced in 5-6 moves
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.