Author: CrayBlitz
Date: 12:07:35 11/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
> >Thanks for your opinion > >I am not sure at all if 317 is an improvement relative to previous version and >one of the possible reasons for the bad result is some bad learning that push it >after some losses to use uncommon lines like 1.b3 or 1.d4 c5(the fact that it >could beat Quark 4-0 with these bad lines encourag it to repeat these lines in >later games and later after losing with b3 it started to try 1.b4 against ufim >and got 2 draws). > > >I also discovered some bug in my pruning in 317 but unfortunately first tries to >fix the bug made it weaker in test suites and I even did not try it in games. >I am not sure if the latest fix is better but I kept it. >another difference between 325 is that I added pruning in the qsearch based on >SEE that do it slightly faster and probably slightly better. > >I did not touch the evaluation of 317 in the latest version that compete in the >promotion tournament. > >result after 54 games at 3 minutes/40 moves on A3000 was 29-25 for 325 against >317(of course it proves nothing but I have no computer time to use for testing >because I prefer to use computer time for other things like correspondence >games). > >Note that I think to rewrite movei but I decided to try to make some improvement >before the promotion tournament. > >Uri Hi! The Good coincidence! I too amateur to play on correspondence..... Truth I love all types a chess.(I even once in a while play blindfold against amateurs). Change movei wait With not patience. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.