Author: Günther Simon
Date: 12:40:02 11/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2005 at 14:57:08, CrayBlitz wrote: >On November 01, 2005 at 13:09:03, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On November 01, 2005 at 12:52:29, CrayBlitz wrote: >> >>> >>>Hi everyone!. >>> Already, there was 19 games in match between SmarThink (323) with very >>>aggressive settings (100/100/160) and Movei 317. Time control:like Championship >>>of the World in 1985 (150'/40+60'/16+60'/16).ST used own book from Sergei >>>Markoff, but Movei played with Perfect v.7. >>> Well 100/100/160 bad settings(i have understood now) for ST,but Movei did not >>>use TB. Each engine used hash 64 mb >>> >>>classic 1 2005 (P4 2530) >>> >>> 1234567890123456789 >>>1 SmarThink 1.00 (323) ½0½½00½½1½½1½01½½11 10.0/19 >>>2 movei 317 ½1½½11½½0½½0½10½½00 9.0/19 >>> >>>movei 317 seems very strong at classical time control and I have no explanations >>>its result on http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/index.html...... >> >>What is the relation of your little match between 2 programs only >>and the tournament results of a different SmarThink and a Movei with >>a different book with different ponder option in different classes against >>different opponents? >>Hint: count the appearance of the word 'different' and may be you know >>the answer already. >> >>Guenther >> >>P.S. how come you have a version of upcoming commercial SmarThink >>and are allowed to use 'CrayBlitz' as a nick? >>I thought this kind of nicks aren't allowed, like e.g. >>'Fisher' 'Kasparov' 'DeepBlue' 'Hyatt2' 'FerretX' if not being >>the entity named after it? > > >Hi,Guenther! >I think that engines must have a different books.You want to see match where >movei uses book SmarThink? >Options? 1 Seems Movei and ST have not general(same) options > 2 Just when I began match were not yet determined best settings for ST >I have a results and against different opponent also (in 60+15 time control) > >>Hint: count the appearance of the word 'different' and may be you know >>the answer already. >> > >I knew answer else then when did not read your post.I in no event pretend on >some proofs I simply tell about interesting match, in the most worthy time >control, at least once for me. Also I hope that played games will be useful for >authors. Hi Alex, Of course games at such time controls are always interesting to look at and probably useful for authors, no doubt. It was your wording in your first message about having 'no explanation about its results at WBEC' which was not justified in comparison to your match. >>how come you have a version of upcoming commercial SmarThink >>and are allowed to use 'CrayBlitz' as a nick? > >SmarThink this private version! As you think who me its has sent? >Hint:Usually, the private versions send authors of the programs :) Fine, I hoped so, but well sometimes we had different cases. >My name is Malutin Alex. I created itself such nick else when did not know all >rules. About this I stinger now.... It's much nicer now to know one talks to a real Human, not to another 'CrayBlitz' or whatever, Alex :) (I want to add that I wouldn't have written my first message also, if your profile for 'CrayBlitz' had shown some information) Regards, Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.