Author: Harald Faber
Date: 22:40:58 03/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 1999 at 11:52:06, blass uri wrote: >>>I do not think that Fritz has little positional ability. >> >>Sometimes 2 people have to agree that they disagree in one or few points. :-) >>In this position, yes, Fritz managed to use the pieces dynamically. >>Don't conclude from this that Fritz HAS better positional understanding than >>Hiarcs. >>I can also show you ONE example where WChess won against Shredder in an endgame >>with a pawn down. > >This is not only one case when I saw that Fritz5.32 has better positional >understanding then Hiarcs7. > >Here is another example from game 15 of the ssdf games fritz532-Hiarcs7: You can present ALL Fritz' wins one can interpret this way. I can also present ALL Hiarcs' wins to show the opposite. >3r4/p5pp/1p2kbp1/2p5/P1P2P2/1P3K2/3R1P1P/2B5 b - - 0 1 >After Rxd2 Bxd2 Kf5 black cannot lose but >Hiarcs7 with black lost the game: So it is not Fritzchens strong positional understanding but one bad move by Hiarcs. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.