Author: Gregory Owett
Date: 07:57:35 11/02/05
Recently, I launched two tournaments (ponder off) with the same participants, on two different machines. Here results: On P4 2.2 T=15'+5" : 1. Fruit 2.2.1 KS104 7,5 / 10 2. Shredder 9 UCI 5,5 3. Shredder 7.04 CLm1 5 25,00 4. Fruit 2.2.1 Uri 5 23,00 5. Shredder 8 CLD 3,5 17,25 6. Fruit 2.2.1 3,5 16,50 On AMD x2 dual core 4800+ T=15'+5" : 1. Shredder 8 CLD 6,5 / 10 2. Fruit 2.2.1 Uri 6 3. Fruit 2.2.1 KS104 5 25,75 4. Fruit 2.2.1 5 24,25 5. Shredder 9 UCI 4,5 6. Shredder 7.04 CLm1 3 The success of Shredder 8 CLD (UCI) on the dual core machine, confirms what the task manager indicated, i.e. which Shredder 8 CLD, in spite of it is single-threaded engine, used 99% of the two processors, while all the others used 50%, in other words, only one processor. (Native engines, as F8, J9, H9, CT15 etc...use 99% too.) Peter Kasinski thinks that Windows task manager is confused and carryforwards incorrectly. Is there another explanation? Gregory
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.