Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:38:51 11/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2005 at 18:28:34, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On November 02, 2005 at 18:02:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 02, 2005 at 16:23:36, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On November 02, 2005 at 16:19:03, John Dillard wrote: >>> >>>>On November 02, 2005 at 15:34:30, Joshua Shriver wrote: >>>> >>>>>http://www.apple.com/powermac/ >>>>> >>>>>nice :) would make a good quad system. >>>>> >>>>>-Josh >>>> >>>> >>>>They're making a quad system. There's not other system on the market today, >>>>super computer or otherwise, that can process as many gigaflops of info as the >>>>dual core G5. I just wonder if any of the chess programs will benefit from this >>>>power? >>> >>>I know really nothing about computers super or otherwise but I suspect that 76 >>>Gigaflops on the quad core is not faster than the fastest supercomputer of >>>today. >>>Jim >> >>I'm not even convinced that 76 gigaflops is doable on any microcomputer today... >> >>Seems like a _BBBIIIIIGGGGGGG_ stretch... >> >>basically one floating point operation every 13 picoseconds or so... > > >Yes, for very specific optimization with very specific SIMD instructions : > >http://www.apple.com/powermac/dualcore.html > >But more seriously, they give 21 Gigaflops for the Linpack benchmark. The Linpack benchmark leaders: http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/performance.ps This machine: http://www.phys.uu.nl/~steen/web05a/sx-8.html configured with 8 processors does 128 Gflops. With Multiframe (which I am guessing is a huge cluster of the buggers) you can get 90.1 Tflop/s
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.