Author: James T. Walker
Date: 17:39:44 11/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2005 at 16:42:55, Dan Andersson wrote: >On November 02, 2005 at 11:47:17, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On November 02, 2005 at 11:19:07, Jake Sisko wrote: >> >>>This can't be too much slower then the 42, 44, 46, 4800? What are the advantages >>>of a dual core processwor over single core for chess? >> >>I just purchased the 64x2-3800. It's definitely the "low-end" setup. The >>single speed seems about equal to an XP2500-XP2700 machine (hard to tie it down > > Seems a bit low since it is two AMD 64 3200+ cores. If you are a windows person >I have to ask if you have installed the MS XP hotfix for dual cores? > >MvH Dan Andersson > >>exactly). It does give the capability GCP mentions about running two singles on >>each cpu with ponder on and no problems. I'm happy with it as my first dual >>purchase. If you want max speed though you need the 4800 and they are not cheap >>compared to the 3800. >>Jim Hello Dan, I guess I have not since I'm not aware of it. Can you lead me in the right direction? Thanks, Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.