Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:42:34 11/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 03, 2005 at 01:39:38, Günther Simon wrote: >On November 02, 2005 at 17:31:56, Torstein Hall wrote: > >>Not much chess knowledge in Fruit? >> >> K7/1r2r3/4k3/8/8/8/3R4/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Fritz 9 sees a draw in 0 seconds. Does this means that Fruit is not usable for >>endgame analyzis? >> >>Torstein > >Endgame chess knowledge and stalemate/perpetual patterns recognition >have not much in common and I doubt more than a few will show some >reasonable score here without tablebases. >Nevertheless virtually every program will play the mentioned position >correctly, even with a bad score. >Fritz9 will see nothing here too without tablebases, but you know this >already I guess? > >Guenther Maybe you are right but I do not know it because I have no tablebases. Movei has no problem to see scores that are close to a draw without tablebases. I suggest that you use the following draw position to test your favourite program Here tablebases really cannot help so you really detect knowledge of the program Movei has no problems [D]Kn6/pr2r3/4k3/8/8/8/3R4/8 w - - 0 1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.