Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:27:51 11/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 03, 2005 at 06:14:19, Uri Blass wrote: >I believe that test suites may help me more to find better personality relative >to games. > >There are some search parameters that I may want to test changes in them >including testing changes in hash tables that I did not test a long time ago(I >use 64 mbytes but I am not sure if it is the best setting and I only remember >that bigger was not always better in the past). > >I think that testing one personality in many test suite may be 24 hours of >computer time and if you want to test 10 different personalities then it may >take 10 days of computer time. > >result of test suites may help me to find better idea which personality to test >in games. > >If you are interested in testing personalities in test suites write to > >uriblass@hmail.com > >You should of course replace hmail by gmail and I wrote hmail only because of >fear from spam. > >Uri Note also that you can test 00_8_295 I am not sure if latest version is better or worse than 00_8_295 in test suites and there are positions that it is better and positions when it is worse. I am also not sure if latest version is better than 00_8_295 in games but I prefer at this point of time test suites and not games. I plan to rewrite movei that is a long work but when there is a new tournament I am still tempted to change the old code because of a tournament so I added more options to change search variables. I am interested only in testing changing search parameters. I know that being better in test suites is not always being better in games and practically 00_8_295 use some agressive evaluation based pruning that is productive in games and not in test suites so I do not claim that I will suggest to test the personality that scores best in test suites. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.