Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:17:47 11/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2005 at 09:16:54, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 04, 2005 at 08:46:07, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > >>> >>>Heinz, yes, looking at the ELO performance against the various opponents is >>>fascinating. Against some of the weaker opponents, the ELO performances are >>>huge. So once we get more matches against weaker opponents, and bring the >>>average opponent ELO down to a similar level to Fruit 2.2, then I reckon we may >>>see maybe a 5 point advantage to Fruit 2.2.1 over Fruit 2.2 >> >>Hi Ray, >> >>yes, would be better than nothing and about what most CEGT testers expected >>beforehand. > >The difference is smaller than the statistical error so we can say nothing >even if the difference in rating is 5 elo. > >I think that it could be expected because possible gain from the 5 piece >tablebases is very small. > >potential gain from tablebases is higher for weak program but unfortunately >fruit is not a weak program. > >Uri of course when I say "unfortunately" I mean relative to the target of seeing significant gain. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.