Author: David H. McClain
Date: 10:04:29 11/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2005 at 07:25:32, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >Hi all, > >CEGT testers could demonstrate that Fruit 2.2.1 performs better with tablebases >support than Fruit 2.2 without :-). Only testers with 5 men EGTB participated in >the test. > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ranglisteall.html > >Seriously, there will probably be a few rating points difference more soon. >Fruit 2.2.1 is having considerably better average opposition ELO compared to >Fruit 2.2 and it is known that Fruit performs better against weaker opposition. >Just compare ELO performance against the different stronger and weaker >opponents. Currently we have matches in progress against weaker opposition. So >just wait and see. > >More than 2000 new games with comments are available for download. > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/downloads.htm > >Best Regards >CEGT team Heinz, You and your testers run an outstanding and very informative site along with many other CCC members that give freely of their time and money because of their deep interest and commitment. I have learned a lot here over the last few years. Thank you very much. DHM
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.