Author: gerold daniels
Date: 03:13:31 11/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2005 at 04:20:41, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: > >Impressive Fruit 2.2.1!! > >Tourney: > >Fritz 9 - own book >Fruit 2.2.1 - own book >Deep Shredder 9.1 UCI -own book > >Junior 9 GUI > >40/40 + 40/40 + 40 > >Pentium IV, 3,00 Mhz. > >Standings after 39 out of 150 games: > > 1 2 3 >Fruit 2.2.1 ......... 9,5-3,5 9,0-4,0 18,5/26 >Fritz 9 3,5-9,5 ....... 7,5-5,5 11,0/26 >Deep Shredder 9,1 4,0-9,0 5,5-7,5 ....... 9,5/26 > >Some comments and feelings: > >- Until now, Deep Shredder 9.1 has never been beaten by any program in all my >previous tests. This time, this world champion program has problems to beat its >two very strong rivals. > >- Fruit 2.2.1 seems to get advantage from an exceptional end-game playing >strength... against two very strong end-game players!. > >- I do no expect that Fruit can increase or even maintain this enormous >performance (71%) in the overall tourney. My guess now is that the tourney (150 >games) will end around: > >Fruit 2.2.1 65/100 >Fritz 9 45/100 >Deep Shredder 9.1 40/100 > >Do you dare to forecast?. ;-) > >Regards, > >Tom. Hello Tom. Thanks for the interesting matches. DOes any of them or all of them using the egtb. Be interesting to see if tb readly does any good. Gerold. P.S. Fruit will lose a little ground but not much. Fritz will gain a little. Shredder will gain a little more than Fritz. I think Fritz and Shredder is about equal with Fruit 10 percent better. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.