Author: Christopher Conkie
Date: 04:20:02 11/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2005 at 23:08:24, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 04, 2005 at 20:58:16, Peter Eizenhammer wrote: > >> >>You were aware, that the progs dont see this simple line >> >>... Bxa5 2. Qxa5 g2 3. Qg5 h3 4. Nd5 a5 5. d4 Qh2 6. Qe7+ Kb8 7. Qd8+ Kb7 8. >>Qb6+ Ka8 9. Qxa5+ Kb7 10. Qb6+ Ka8 11. Qc6+ Ka7 12. Nc7 Kb8 13. Na6+ Ka7 14. >>Nc5 Qb8+ 15. Ka3 Qb6 16. Qa4+ Kb8 17. Nd7+ Kb7 18. Nxb6 g1=Q 19. Qb5 Qg3+ 20. >>b3 h2 21. Nd5+ Ka8 22. Qc6+ Ka7 23. Nc7 Kb8 24. Na6+ Ka7 25. Nc5 h1=Q 26. Qxh1 >>* >>at once. I left away the easy stuff not to confuse anybody ;-) >>(I am sure you saw this, didn't you?) >>Even very strong progs need some nanosecs for that little calculation... >> >>So the really strange wild guessings you make are not convincing. >>Shouldn't you just say that you told nonsense? >>And that the position is something like an am test and nothing else? >> >>Peter > >I think that he was only joking. > >Of course it is absurd to think that Fritz is a crafty clone based on this >position and showing that many free engines that are not clones play the same >move only proves that he is joking (It is clear that free Glaurung or Arasan or >Crafty are different engines) > >Uri I was wondering when someone might point out the humour in this. It is true that there are very few non open source/non commercial engines that do this move. The commercial ones include as stated Fritz9 (which is a Dutch engine), Chess Tiger 15/Gambit Tiger 2 and a few others......for example..... A Dutch engine......Tao 5.6 Another Dutch engine.......Wing 1.6 And another engine........Celes 0.77c which as you have probably guessed by now and my atlas tells me, comes from........the Netherlands. :) Christopher
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.