Author: Steve B
Date: 04:26:50 11/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
>I simply think that the rating is more correct if you play not only against >weaker opponents and if you put fruit only against weaker opponents you will not >get realistic rating. i also think this and if you read this thread from the start you will see i said just that.. here is my quote > >personally i am not so happy with the opponents the Res-Ruffian faced for its >2383 rating > >it gained alot of points against weaker opposition and did not even play the R40 > >If the target is to find how it performs against dedicated units you do not need >rating list and can have result of matches when fruit beats everything. yes i agree we do not need an SSDF rating if it will play against PC programs if it will play dedicated units then its very good the goal is to compare "like kind with like kind" and establish a rating the goal was never to acheive the "absolute truth" for strength if it were the SSDF would test against Super GM'S and incorporate those ratings enough games against humans have been played already to factor in these games but to do so misses the whole point i am a collector..something you just dont seem to want to understand Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.