Author: Robert Hollay
Date: 07:49:04 11/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2005 at 08:06:20, Chessfun wrote: > 32 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 2575 34 34 250 53.0 % 2554 37.2 % > 33 Deep Fritz : 2574 22 22 625 54.0 % 2546 37.0 % > 34 Ruffian Leiden2003 : 2571 33 33 266 48.3 % 2582 38.7 % > 35 Hiarcs 8 : 2561 33 33 266 47.6 % 2578 39.5 % > 36 Junior 7 : 2561 24 24 594 49.1 % 2567 28.8 % > 37 Chessmaster 10000 : 2560 28 28 303 47.7 % 2576 47.9 % > 38 Ruffian 2.0.0 : 2559 37 37 210 46.4 % 2584 38.6 % > 39 List 504 : 2552 30 30 295 47.3 % 2571 43.1 % > 40 Gambit Tiger 1.0 : 2551 31 31 319 55.0 % 2516 33.5 % > 41 Chessmaster 9000 : 2548 37 37 206 46.8 % 2570 39.3 % > 42 List 512 : 2546 31 31 285 47.9 % 2560 41.8 % > 43 SOS 4 for Arena : 2541 37 37 226 48.0 % 2555 33.2 % > 44 Deep Sjeng 1.5 : 2537 39 39 200 45.0 % 2572 35.0 % > 45 Deep Sjeng 1.6 : 2536 27 27 408 46.4 % 2561 36.5 % > 46 Fritz 6 : 2532 15 15 1228 52.7 % 2513 37.7 % > 47 Chess Tiger 13.0 : 2532 24 24 487 51.4 % 2522 41.3 % > 48 Ruffian 1.0.5 : 2531 38 38 210 41.7 % 2589 35.7 % It's interesting: Ruffian 1.0.1 is 53.0%, Ruffian 1.0.5 is only 41.7%! But nearly everybody says that Ruffian 1.0.5 is slightly better. Of course, Ruffian 1.0.1 had slightly weaker opponents, but nevertheless it's a considerable difference. Robert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.