Author: Chessfun
Date: 08:15:33 11/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2005 at 09:46:28, James T. Walker wrote: >Hello Sarah, >I don't think any match of 9 or 10 games is very noteworthy. The total score is >more interesting but even then only after several hundred games against strong >opponents. Of course the problem with long time controls is it takes a long >time to gather significant data. I'm happy to see your results though. They >will become more intersting later. >Jim Jim, Of course as with any data regarding chess the more the better it becomes. As for match size I think simply more variety of opponents will produce more reliable results than say 5 matches of 50 games. But playing 40'/40+40'/40+40'games produces only something like 300 games per month. So obviously time and resources are always a factor. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.