Author: Chessfun
Date: 10:29:33 11/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2005 at 13:14:21, Robert Hollay wrote: >On November 05, 2005 at 12:02:58, Uri Blass wrote: > >>>It's interesting: Ruffian 1.0.1 is 53.0%, Ruffian 1.0.5 is only 41.7%! >>>But nearly everybody says that Ruffian 1.0.5 is slightly better. >> >>Most people did not say nothing about it so I think that it is not correct that >>nearly everybody says that 1.0.5 is better. >> > > True, I'm sorry. It should be: nearly everybody who've said something >about it here, or more accurately, what I have read here. > I myself asked this question here a few months ago, and I was told that these >two versions are nearly identical, just 1.0.5 has some bugs fixed regarding >time control in blitz games, so it should be slightly better. As far as I recall that is correct. 1.0.5 and 1.0.1 should have been almost identical rating wise and as I stated elsewhere at some point they were. You could also argue they still are as they are within their respective error bars. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.