Author: James T. Walker
Date: 16:18:25 11/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2005 at 04:20:41, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: > >Impressive Fruit 2.2.1!! > >Tourney: > >Fritz 9 - own book >Fruit 2.2.1 - own book >Deep Shredder 9.1 UCI -own book > >Junior 9 GUI > >40/40 + 40/40 + 40 > >Pentium IV, 3,00 Mhz. > >Standings after 39 out of 150 games: > > 1 2 3 >Fruit 2.2.1 ......... 9,5-3,5 9,0-4,0 18,5/26 >Fritz 9 3,5-9,5 ....... 7,5-5,5 11,0/26 >Deep Shredder 9,1 4,0-9,0 5,5-7,5 ....... 9,5/26 > >Some comments and feelings: > >- Until now, Deep Shredder 9.1 has never been beaten by any program in all my >previous tests. This time, this world champion program has problems to beat its >two very strong rivals. > >- Fruit 2.2.1 seems to get advantage from an exceptional end-game playing >strength... against two very strong end-game players!. > >- I do no expect that Fruit can increase or even maintain this enormous >performance (71%) in the overall tourney. My guess now is that the tourney (150 >games) will end around: > >Fruit 2.2.1 65/100 >Fritz 9 45/100 >Deep Shredder 9.1 40/100 > >Do you dare to forecast?. ;-) > >Regards, > >Tom. This is interesting to me also. I would like to know your setup. Are these games auto232 or one machine with ponder on/off. Is Deep Shredder running only one cpu? Thanks, Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.