Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Is it correct that the ssdf is against testing humans in the list?

Author: Martin Andersen2

Date: 23:42:24 11/05/05

Go up one level in this thread

On November 06, 2005 at 00:44:59, Uri Blass wrote:


>
>I always thought that ssdf is going to include humans in the list in case that
>there is a sponsor to pay for that purpose.
>
>Uri

Probably correct. SSDF needs a strong human grandmaster, preferably several
grandmasters, and they must play a lot of games. It's not possible, who
will pay ?

Martin.

• Re: Is it correct that the ssdf is against testing humans in the list? Uri Blass 07:16:04 11/06/05
  • Re: Is it correct that the ssdf is against testing humans in the list? Robert Hollay 08:54:11 11/06/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.