Author: Kaj Soderberg
Date: 05:30:35 11/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2005 at 08:16:47, Eelco de Groot wrote: >On November 04, 2005 at 13:52:31, Kaj Soderberg wrote: > >>Hi there, >> >>I'm trying out parameters both on Pro Deo and Rebel 12 to see if there is >>difference in practical behaviour, in favour of one or the other. Now i wonder >>from which engine version MISC_66 can be used. From R12.00.02 as delivered of >>course, but also in R12.00.01 (in order to work under XP)? >> >>BTW my favourite enhancement until now is the use of a selectivity of 80 and the >>pruning of bad moves set at 2, although already seen in R12 beta 4. Stuff of >>tactical nature is seen earlier, though the ply level (logically) is lower due >>to slow-down of the engine. In some endgames the engine seems to hang or freeze >>quite a bit when using this combination, but i think the combination at an >>average improves both PD 1.1 and R12.00.01. I will look for a way to diminish >>the freezing stuff. >> >>Thanks in advance for answers. >> >>Kind regards, >> >>Kaj > >Hello Kaj, > >I don't rightly remember. Wasn't Rebel 12.00.01 an update from Ed for the >Windows version? And I have an UPDATE1.eng in >D:\Programma's\REBELWINDOWS\engines\Rebel12\personal with booklearning files for >Rebel 12.00.01 that shows settings with the fix for the Diep - Rebel bug from >the Dutch championship, I think the fix was partly the reson for that update? So >then the answer would be yes, as far as my memory goes... > >Best, >Eelco > >p.s. I never tried the PRUNE BAD MOVES stuff myself, maybe I will, in the vague >hope that one day Ed might make a new compile for Pro Deo... But as you maybe >know, untraceable bug has Ed in (need of) a fix as he reported in Chess >Thinker's Forum couple of weeks ago.. > >[Personality = Update1.ENG] * Rebel 12 (November 2003) >[Pawn Value = 100] >[Knight Value = 100] >[Bishop Value = 100] >[Rook Value = 100] >[Queen Value = 100] >[King Safety = 150] >[Mobility = 100] >[Pawn Structure = 100] >[Passed Pawns = 100] >[Pins = 100] >[Bishop Pair = 100] >[Chess Knowledge = 100] >[Attractiveness = 101] >[Attacking = 100] >[Strength of Play = 100] >[Draw Contempt Factor = 0.00] >[Selective Search = 100] >[Search Technique = NULLMOVE] >[Engine Learner = off] * off|on >[Book Learner = off] * off|passive|moderate|strong|aggressive >[Position Learner = off] * off|on >[Extended Book Learner = off] * off|read|write|read&write >[Pruning = MISC_25] * >[Pruning = MISC_37] * >[Pruning = MISC_40] * >[Pruning = MISC_66] * Fixes Diep-Rebel bug >[Center Control = 25] * 25 >[Bishop Mobility = 25] * 25 >[Right to Move = 75] * 75 >[Strong Squares = 125] * 125 >[ANTI-GM = OFF] >[EVALUATION = SMART] * NORMAL|SMART >[Extensions (remaining)= 3] >[Extensions (checks)= 0] >[Extensions (captures)= 0] Hi Eelco, Thanks for the info. I sincerely hope Ed can recover from his bug dip. IMO a champ like Ed may retire at the height of his career, but not when been struck by bad luck. So i hope he'll pull he's gloves back on and get into the ring where we all can enjoy the master at work. Greetings, Kaj
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.