Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 06:39:43 11/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2005 at 00:44:59, Uri Blass wrote: >There was a claim in another discussion that the ssdf is in principle against >testing humans. > >The claim was not by ssdf tester and if it is correct I want to read it from >ssdf testers. > >I always thought that the problem is that humans are not available for playing >matches of 40 games against Fruit and Fritz and other programs and paying humans >money and checking that the humans do not cheat is too expensive. > >I always thought that ssdf is going to include humans in the list in case that >there is a sponsor to pay for that purpose. > >Uri The idea has always been to compare programs against humans in tournaments. Especially in the past days a good player could learn to play the same lines over and over winning the same game again and again. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.