Author: Günther Simon
Date: 12:49:45 11/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2005 at 09:39:43, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On November 06, 2005 at 00:44:59, Uri Blass wrote: > >>There was a claim in another discussion that the ssdf is in principle against >>testing humans. >> >>The claim was not by ssdf tester and if it is correct I want to read it from >>ssdf testers. >> >>I always thought that the problem is that humans are not available for playing >>matches of 40 games against Fruit and Fritz and other programs and paying humans >>money and checking that the humans do not cheat is too expensive. >> >>I always thought that ssdf is going to include humans in the list in case that >>there is a sponsor to pay for that purpose. >> >>Uri > >The idea has always been to compare programs against humans in tournaments. >Especially in the past days a good player could learn to play the same lines >over and over winning the same game again and again. > >Bertil Is this a 'yes' or a 'no' to Uris question? Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.