Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 13:19:26 11/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2005 at 15:49:45, Günther Simon wrote: >On November 06, 2005 at 09:39:43, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On November 06, 2005 at 00:44:59, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>There was a claim in another discussion that the ssdf is in principle against >>>testing humans. >>> >>>The claim was not by ssdf tester and if it is correct I want to read it from >>>ssdf testers. >>> >>>I always thought that the problem is that humans are not available for playing >>>matches of 40 games against Fruit and Fritz and other programs and paying humans >>>money and checking that the humans do not cheat is too expensive. >>> >>>I always thought that ssdf is going to include humans in the list in case that >>>there is a sponsor to pay for that purpose. >>> >>>Uri >> >>The idea has always been to compare programs against humans in tournaments. >>Especially in the past days a good player could learn to play the same lines >>over and over winning the same game again and again. >> >>Bertil > >Is this a 'yes' or a 'no' to Uris question? > >Guenther Yes, in the best of worlds a lot of humans could be included to give a "true" rating comparison. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.