Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:47:02 11/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2005 at 18:35:10, Paul Jacobean Sacral wrote: >On November 07, 2005 at 18:06:56, Uri Blass wrote: > >>strength of chess engines has nothing to do with beauty. >> >>chess beauty is clearly irrelevant in evaluating chess engines. > >Because you don't understand it or have no sense for it? > >Chess beauty is a major factor in chess, and therefore it is also a major factor >in evaluating chess engines, as long as humans who like chess use chess engines. >If humans are dead and only robots use chess engine as a result of old programs >which are useless then, you may be right. But as long as engines are made for >human chess fans, I'm right. Beauty is subjective and cannot be measured. What is beautiful to me may not be beautiful to you. Wins and losses are easily measured.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.