Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 02:24:09 11/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2005 at 03:12:20, Uri Blass wrote:
>On November 08, 2005 at 02:01:56, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>
>>On November 08, 2005 at 01:39:25, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>On November 07, 2005 at 13:32:29, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I think I have improved Columbus' egg 9g with the latest 9L (Lyon) version.
>>>>
>>>>I am testing it against "Fritz friend" (Fritz 9) at 90 minutes game on 2 equal
>>>>AMD XP 3000+, so similar to SSDF on A1200
>>>>
>>>>Columbus' egg 9L + Shrddr10.bkt prc (preliminary c version) - Fritz 9 = 7 - 4
>>>>(+5, =4, -2) 63.6% TP = +97 Elo
>>>>
>>>>P.N.
>>>>
>>>>1. Shredder10 prc is in std. mode, so not the strongest mode!
>>>>
>>>>2. The improvements on Columbus' egg 9L are mainly strategical in the first
>>>>part/middle game as the new settings are more refined.
>>>>
>>>>If this version will score very well after several games I will post the
>>>>settings.
>>>>
>>>>Ciao
>>>>Sandro
>>>
>>> Hi Sandro
>>> You are very courageous to conclude something
>>> out of 11 games only. In our Fruit 2.2.1 test
>>> Fritz 9 lost in the first 10 games with 2,0-8,0
>>> but was almost equal after 50 games. In my
>>> Nunn2 match, Fritz 9 won the first serie vs
>>> Fruit 2.2.1 with 8,0-2,0 only to loose the
>>> second serie with 3,0-7,0 and from such experience
>>> I can't take matches under 50 games seriously. A
>>> further good examply of how things can go/vary
>>> to be seen at my comments re our RK 2004 tournament
>>> http://www.utzingerk.com/rk_2004_english.htm
>>> Regards
>>> Kurt
>>
>>Hi Kurt,
>>
>>sorry but I said "I think", not I am sure. So you cannot say that I concluded
>>something, however I made several tests before starting the match looking this
>>setting on several positions, so I was not relying on this score, but on a
>>overall judgement.
>
>Did you look at games from CEGT?
>I guess that the games can give you productive knowledge about the mistakes of
>colombus egg 9g so the question is if you found that the new setting can avoid
>significant part of the mistakes of 9g
>
>Uri
Hi Uri
You are surely aware that testing is a very
hard job. If a new setting can avoid the
mistakes of 9g this does not necessarily
mean that the new setting will not produce
other - so far not known - mistakes -:)
Regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.