Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 10:19:26 11/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2005 at 02:22:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On November 08, 2005 at 02:01:56, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On November 08, 2005 at 01:39:25, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On November 07, 2005 at 13:32:29, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>I think I have improved Columbus' egg 9g with the latest 9L (Lyon) version. >>>> >>>>I am testing it against "Fritz friend" (Fritz 9) at 90 minutes game on 2 equal >>>>AMD XP 3000+, so similar to SSDF on A1200 >>>> >>>>Columbus' egg 9L + Shrddr10.bkt prc (preliminary c version) - Fritz 9 = 7 - 4 >>>>(+5, =4, -2) 63.6% TP = +97 Elo >>>> >>>>P.N. >>>> >>>>1. Shredder10 prc is in std. mode, so not the strongest mode! >>>> >>>>2. The improvements on Columbus' egg 9L are mainly strategical in the first >>>>part/middle game as the new settings are more refined. >>>> >>>>If this version will score very well after several games I will post the >>>>settings. >>>> >>>>Ciao >>>>Sandro >>> >>> Hi Sandro >>> You are very courageous to conclude something >>> out of 11 games only. In our Fruit 2.2.1 test >>> Fritz 9 lost in the first 10 games with 2,0-8,0 >>> but was almost equal after 50 games. In my >>> Nunn2 match, Fritz 9 won the first serie vs >>> Fruit 2.2.1 with 8,0-2,0 only to loose the >>> second serie with 3,0-7,0 and from such experience >>> I can't take matches under 50 games seriously. A >>> further good examply of how things can go/vary >>> to be seen at my comments re our RK 2004 tournament >>> http://www.utzingerk.com/rk_2004_english.htm >>> Regards >>> Kurt >> >>Hi Kurt, >> >>sorry but I said "I think", not I am sure. So you cannot say that I concluded >>something, however I made several tests before starting the match looking this >>setting on several positions, so I was not relying on this score, but on a >>overall judgement. >> >>Just for your info the score now is: >> >>Columbus' egg 9L + SH10-prc (std mode) - Fritz 9 = 11.5 - 5.5 (+8, =7, -2) 67.7% >>TP = +128 Elo >> >>P.N. I am not saying this version with the improved book is +128 Elo points >>stronger, but just reporting what is written in the top row of the interface so >>far. >> >>Ciao >>Sandro > > > Hi Sandro > Thanks for your additional information > BTW: Have you seen that in our Shredder 9 > test we have already played 1,300 games > at time control 40'/40 > http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm > Regards > Kurt Hi Kurt, yes and I think you did a great job. I personally prefer longer times controls as unless you use an extremely fast computer you cannot get the most in the search as the depth would not be enough. I understand however that in order to get enough games it is necessary to speed up time controls as much as possible. Ciao Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.