Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 07:45:19 11/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2005 at 10:16:38, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >I gepostet here only one game and an analysis, (the criticism at me came later, >see Thread. Why?). > >Is it forbidden that I post a game and an analysis here? > In my opinion you and everyone else SHOULD be allowed to post a game and analysis of any newer TOGA version......This has nothing to do with releasing the code or not. IMO BUT......You have said the following things that were completely incorrect! ------"That is cool! First released the programmer of Fruit a open sourse version of fruit (no commercioal!) for all ua people. then come Thomas Gaksch an make a stronger Toga 0.93 and later 0.94. After this the programmer of fruit make with Toga-Ideas a stonger Fruit 2.1. After Fruit 2.1 com Thomas and make a clear stronger Toga II 1.0 based on Fruit. The Programmer of Fruit see it and make an stronger Fruit 2.2 (or Fruit WCCC 05) an goes commercial with his strong program an make money!"---------- That is complete nonsense.......Fruit's 2.1 and 2.2 power comes from Fabien's programming skills! I don't say that Thomas Gaksch made something wrong, in fact i like the releases of Toga, but to say that Fabien makes money because of Toga is insane! Unfortunatelly i see that the release of code of Fruit was a mistake after all...... We not only don't give full credit Fabien for doing that, but we remove some by saying Fruit 2.2 is not Fabien's exclusive project.....
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.