Author: Günther Simon
Date: 07:52:24 11/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2005 at 10:45:19, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On November 09, 2005 at 10:16:38, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>I gepostet here only one game and an analysis, (the criticism at me came later, >>see Thread. Why?). >> >>Is it forbidden that I post a game and an analysis here? >> > > In my opinion you and everyone else SHOULD be allowed to post a game and >analysis of any newer TOGA version......This has nothing to do with releasing >the code or not. IMO > > >BUT......You have said the following things that were completely incorrect! > >------"That is cool! First released the programmer of Fruit a open sourse >version of fruit (no commercioal!) for all ua people. then come Thomas Gaksch an >make a >stronger Toga 0.93 and later 0.94. After this the programmer of fruit make with >Toga-Ideas a stonger Fruit 2.1. After Fruit 2.1 com Thomas and make a clear >stronger Toga II 1.0 based on Fruit. > >The Programmer of Fruit see it and make an stronger Fruit 2.2 (or Fruit WCCC 05) >an goes commercial with his strong program an make money!"---------- > > That is complete nonsense.......Fruit's 2.1 and 2.2 power comes from Fabien's >programming skills! I don't say that Thomas Gaksch made something wrong, in fact >i like the releases of Toga, but to say that Fabien makes money because of Toga >is insane! Exactly, but I wrote this already here: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?460606 > Unfortunatelly i see that the release of code of Fruit was a mistake after >all...... > We not only don't give full credit Fabien for doing that, but we remove some by >saying Fruit 2.2 is not Fabien's exclusive project..... Not 'We', just a very few people who have no idea about programming and the difference between Fruit, Toga and Fruit commercial. Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.