Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 11:24:48 11/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2005 at 12:52:52, Dann Corbit wrote: >In my opinion it is no sin to be wrong about something. We gather facts and >draw conclusions. Sometimes the facts are wrong, sometimes the inferences are >wrong and sometimes the conclusions are wrong. In any case, Eduard Nemeth is a >good and honest person and I expect that once the correct information comes to >light he will understand better. Yes he is, but i would not start talking with confidence about something that i'm uninformed........ > >I did not read the thread in question about Fruit verses Toga. > >Fruit and Toga are now somewhat independent efforts. Let's not denigrate the >effort of either programmer. We shall continue to recieve value from both of >them. Yes, but we should agree that Fabien can do WHATEVER he wants with Fruit (show or not the code, make it or not commercial, etc), while everyone else who modifies already released Fruit code SHOULD include his code for any Fruit modifications.......That's what i believe, that Eduard can't swallow. Look at his words: -----"Toga 1.1 or Toga 1.0 MV is a own idea of implement Course. It is never Fruit 2.2. Why must a programmer open his the full sourse of own ideas? It is fact: The MV Toga 1.0 based on Fruit is in PV Mode a own idea and not a idea of programmer by Fruit. Example: If I make a Engine based on Fruit 2.1 I should open this sourse but in my opinion it is no the Case when I find a own Idea to implement a PV Mode. Own Odeas should be copiright to the programmers there have this ideas, and in the case of Toga II MV is this the case!"---------- He proposes that he can change something on Fruit but because that something is his idea, he is allowed NOT to make public the source code. That is of course against the GPL........
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.