Author: Enam
Date: 12:32:08 11/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2005 at 13:19:26, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On November 08, 2005 at 02:22:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On November 08, 2005 at 02:01:56, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On November 08, 2005 at 01:39:25, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>On November 07, 2005 at 13:32:29, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>> >>>>>I think I have improved Columbus' egg 9g with the latest 9L (Lyon) version. >>>>> >>>>>I am testing it against "Fritz friend" (Fritz 9) at 90 minutes game on 2 equal >>>>>AMD XP 3000+, so similar to SSDF on A1200 >>>>> >>>>>Columbus' egg 9L + Shrddr10.bkt prc (preliminary c version) - Fritz 9 = 7 - 4 >>>>>(+5, =4, -2) 63.6% TP = +97 Elo >>>>> >>>>>P.N. >>>>> >>>>>1. Shredder10 prc is in std. mode, so not the strongest mode! >>>>> >>>>>2. The improvements on Columbus' egg 9L are mainly strategical in the first >>>>>part/middle game as the new settings are more refined. >>>>> >>>>>If this version will score very well after several games I will post the >>>>>settings. >>>>> >>>>>Ciao >>>>>Sandro >>>> >>>> Hi Sandro >>>> You are very courageous to conclude something >>>> out of 11 games only. In our Fruit 2.2.1 test >>>> Fritz 9 lost in the first 10 games with 2,0-8,0 >>>> but was almost equal after 50 games. In my >>>> Nunn2 match, Fritz 9 won the first serie vs >>>> Fruit 2.2.1 with 8,0-2,0 only to loose the >>>> second serie with 3,0-7,0 and from such experience >>>> I can't take matches under 50 games seriously. A >>>> further good examply of how things can go/vary >>>> to be seen at my comments re our RK 2004 tournament >>>> http://www.utzingerk.com/rk_2004_english.htm >>>> Regards >>>> Kurt >>> >>>Hi Kurt, >>> >>>sorry but I said "I think", not I am sure. So you cannot say that I concluded >>>something, however I made several tests before starting the match looking this >>>setting on several positions, so I was not relying on this score, but on a >>>overall judgement. >>> >>>Just for your info the score now is: >>> >>>Columbus' egg 9L + SH10-prc (std mode) - Fritz 9 = 11.5 - 5.5 (+8, =7, -2) 67.7% >>>TP = +128 Elo >>> >>>P.N. I am not saying this version with the improved book is +128 Elo points >>>stronger, but just reporting what is written in the top row of the interface so >>>far. >>> >>>Ciao >>>Sandro >> >> >> Hi Sandro >> Thanks for your additional information >> BTW: Have you seen that in our Shredder 9 >> test we have already played 1,300 games >> at time control 40'/40 >> http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm >> Regards >> Kurt > >Hi Kurt, > >yes and I think you did a great job. >I personally prefer longer times controls as unless you use an extremely fast >computer you cannot get the most in the search as the depth would not be enough. >I understand however that in order to get enough games it is necessary to speed >up time controls as much as possible. > >Ciao >Sandro Hi Sandro, Can you please post Deep Shredder 9 Columbus egg 9L Settings . Regards Enam.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.