Author: John Merlino
Date: 13:07:13 11/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2005 at 14:15:35, Dan Ellwein wrote: >On November 09, 2005 at 14:04:56, Chessfun wrote: > >Hi Sarah > >Good job with the testing... > >It's sad to see CM10 at 35 - should be a lot better than this... > >Dan It really isn't at 35th place. Just count how many different versions of other engines there are there, and eliminate the obvious "duplicates". Examples: 1 Fruit 2.2.1 : 2710 50 49 119 67.6 % 2582 39.5 % 2 Fruit 2.2 : 2691 41 40 174 64.9 % 2584 40.2 % 15 Fruit 2.1 : 2606 35 35 230 53.5 % 2581 40.0 % 16 Fritz 8 : 2605 22 22 620 53.9 % 2578 38.4 % 18 Fritz 8 Bilbao : 2599 36 36 221 51.1 % 2591 38.9 % 31 Fritz 8 (No MMX) : 2575 37 37 200 52.2 % 2560 41.5 % 20 Shredder 7.04 : 2598 27 27 430 52.9 % 2578 35.1 % 22 Shredder 7 : 2597 28 28 401 51.9 % 2584 34.4 % 26 Shredder Paderborn : 2588 32 32 292 52.2 % 2572 34.6 % 12 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 2610 25 25 416 54.3 % 2580 42.8 % 17 Chess Tiger 15.0 ga : 2600 42 42 183 56.3 % 2556 31.7 % jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.