Author: John Merlino
Date: 22:29:54 11/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2005 at 00:53:58, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On November 09, 2005 at 16:08:53, John Merlino wrote: > >>On November 09, 2005 at 14:26:27, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>... Chessmaster 10000 (rank 35) >>>what a disappointment >>>Regards >>>Kurt >> >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?460732 >> >>And note that it's still better than CM 9000 default (at least in this test), >>which many people (including yourself, I think) said that it may not be.... >> >>jm > > Hi John > The only thing I know for sure is that > CM10k default is weaker than some of the > best CM9k-settings. I mentîoned this here: > http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm > Regards > Kurt Yes, I am aware of that and I think you are correct. Some of the best settings have improved on the default by as much as 75-100 points. I would have been surprised if the CMX default settings were better than that. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.