Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 07:02:47 11/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2005 at 08:02:19, Chessfun wrote: >On November 10, 2005 at 04:39:11, Joachim Rang wrote: > >> >>> >>> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >>> >>> 1 Fruit 2.2.1 : 2710 50 49 119 67.6 % 2582 39.5 % >>> 2 Fruit 2.2 : 2691 41 40 174 64.9 % 2584 40.2 % >>> 3 Fritz 9 : 2682 31 31 310 62.4 % 2594 38.4 % >> >>Interesting to see that so far on your rating list there is a difference between >>2.2. and 2.2.1. I'm curious whether it will hold with more games. >> >>Joachim > >They will both end playing the same amount of games against the same opponents. >But the margin of error will still be very high. Obviously there is a difference >since one is probing tablebases the other not. My guess is that 2.2.1 must be >better only question is by how much. Another 10 days probably before these are >both finished. > >Interestingly the scores against some programs are totally opposite > >Individual statistics: > >1 Fruit 2.2.1 : 2710 119 (+ 57,= 47,- 15), 67.6 % > >Nimzo 8 : 4 (+ 0,= 3,- 1), 37.5 % >Hiarcs 7.32 : 4 (+ 1,= 1,- 2), 37.5 % >Chess Tiger 14.0 : 4 (+ 3,= 0,- 1), 75.0 % >Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 4 (+ 3,= 1,- 0), 87.5 % >Junior 7 : 5 (+ 3,= 2,- 0), 80.0 % >Fritz 7 : 5 (+ 2,= 3,- 0), 70.0 % >Hiarcs 8 : 4 (+ 0,= 4,- 0), 50.0 % >Shredder Paderborn : 4 (+ 1,= 1,- 2), 37.5 % >Shredder 7 : 5 (+ 2,= 3,- 0), 70.0 % >List 504 : 4 (+ 3,= 1,- 0), 87.5 % >Junior 8 : 5 (+ 2,= 2,- 1), 60.0 % >Hiarcs 9 : 4 (+ 3,= 1,- 0), 87.5 % >Hiarcs8 Bareev : 4 (+ 3,= 1,- 0), 87.5 % >Ruffian Leiden2003 : 4 (+ 2,= 2,- 0), 75.0 % >Shredder 8 : 5 (+ 2,= 2,- 1), 60.0 % >SOS 4 for Arena : 4 (+ 4,= 0,- 0), 100.0 % >Ruffian 2.1.0 : 4 (+ 2,= 1,- 1), 62.5 % >List 512 : 4 (+ 2,= 2,- 0), 75.0 % >Ruffian 2.0.2 : 4 (+ 0,= 1,- 3), 12.5 % >Crafty 19.08 : 4 (+ 3,= 1,- 0), 87.5 % >Fritz in Bahrain : 5 (+ 2,= 3,- 0), 70.0 % >Fritz 8 Bilbao : 5 (+ 0,= 5,- 0), 50.0 % >Junior 9 : 5 (+ 2,= 3,- 0), 70.0 % >X3D Fritz : 5 (+ 4,= 1,- 0), 90.0 % >Shredder 9 : 5 (+ 3,= 0,- 2), 60.0 % >Toga II 1.0 : 5 (+ 2,= 3,- 0), 70.0 % >Crafty 19.19 : 4 (+ 3,= 0,- 1), 75.0 % > >2 Fruit 2.2 : 2691 174 (+ 78,= 70,- 26), 64.9 % > >Nimzo 8 : 6 (+ 5,= 1,- 0), 91.7 % >Hiarcs 7.32 : 6 (+ 3,= 2,- 1), 66.7 % >Chess Tiger 14.0 : 6 (+ 0,= 6,- 0), 50.0 % >Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 6 (+ 1,= 4,- 1), 50.0 % >Junior 7 : 6 (+ 6,= 0,- 0), 100.0 % >Fritz 7 : 6 (+ 1,= 5,- 0), 58.3 % >Hiarcs 8 : 6 (+ 2,= 4,- 0), 66.7 % >Shredder Paderborn : 6 (+ 5,= 1,- 0), 91.7 % >Shredder 7 : 6 (+ 4,= 1,- 1), 75.0 % >List 504 : 6 (+ 3,= 1,- 2), 58.3 % >Junior 8 : 6 (+ 3,= 2,- 1), 66.7 % >Hiarcs 9 : 6 (+ 1,= 4,- 1), 50.0 % >Hiarcs8 Bareev : 6 (+ 4,= 1,- 1), 75.0 % >Ruffian Leiden2003 : 6 (+ 3,= 1,- 2), 58.3 % >Shredder 8 : 6 (+ 1,= 3,- 2), 41.7 % >SOS 4 for Arena : 6 (+ 2,= 1,- 3), 41.7 % >Ruffian 2.1.0 : 6 (+ 1,= 5,- 0), 58.3 % >List 512 : 6 (+ 3,= 3,- 0), 75.0 % >Ruffian 2.0.2 : 6 (+ 2,= 3,- 1), 58.3 % >Crafty 19.08 : 6 (+ 6,= 0,- 0), 100.0 % >Fritz in Bahrain : 6 (+ 1,= 3,- 2), 41.7 % >Fritz 8 Bilbao : 6 (+ 2,= 4,- 0), 66.7 % >Junior 9 : 6 (+ 3,= 2,- 1), 66.7 % >X3D Fritz : 6 (+ 1,= 4,- 1), 50.0 % >Shredder 9 : 7 (+ 1,= 3,- 3), 35.7 % >Toga II 1.0 : 7 (+ 3,= 3,- 1), 64.3 % >Fritz 9 : 10 (+ 6,= 2,- 2), 70.0 % >Crafty 19.19 : 6 (+ 5,= 1,- 0), 91.7 % > >Sarah. Hi Sarah, I'm looking forward for the result after each version played the same opponents. Btw, when do you plan to update your rating list on your website? Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.