Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 23:53:34 11/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2005 at 14:04:50, Günther Simon wrote: >On November 10, 2005 at 12:49:55, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On November 10, 2005 at 12:48:04, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On November 10, 2005 at 02:42:06, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >>> >>>>On November 09, 2005 at 13:16:30, ERIQ wrote: >>>> >>>>>does anyone else find it strange that such a powerful program could be named >>>>>fruit?! This I think is to passive of a name maybe better something stronger >>>>>more robust. But I cann't think of anything at moment so lets do it together >>>>>shall we. >>>> >>>>Very good idea! >>>>Something stronger is >>>> ChessTiger >>>> Chessmaster >>>> ChessLion >>>> ChessFritz >>>> ChessFranz >>>> ChessKing >>>> Crafty6.4 >> >>Yawn. >> >>>> Kasparov >> >>Used to destroy chess database by pollution of the human namespace. >> >>>> Karpov >> >>Used to destroy chess database by pollution of the human namespace. >> >>>> Krampov >> >>Used to destroy chess database by pollution of the human namespace. >> >>>> Kaspov >> >>Used to destroy chess database by pollution of the human namespace. >> >>>> Karparov >> >>Used to destroy chess database by pollution of the human namespace. >> >>>> Kramnik >> >>Used to destroy chess database by pollution of the human namespace. >> >>>> Krampov >>>> Kramparov >> >>I think you are supposed to take a pill to cure these. >> >>>>just to name a few. >> >>Double-triple YUCK. >> >>>>kind regards >>>>Bernhard > >Dann, I take Bernhards post as pure irony ;-) Your completely right. Sorry, couldn't resist. Some more Kamsky, Kamska, Ivan, Chuck, Kamchuck, Karchuck, Kaschuck on the other hand I wouldn't like names like Pudding, Whiner, Looser kind regards Bernhard > >Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.