Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:50:24 11/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 2005 at 07:40:42, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On November 11, 2005 at 07:33:15, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>This is stunning, when other testers have reported normally Fruit - Junior >>to about 70 - 30. >> >>Jouni > > Hi Jouni > Not necessarily: you know SSDF are testing > the whole package with own books, learning on, > ponder=on and thus partly not the strength of > the engines but more the goodness of the opening > books ... and Junior 9 is one of the engines to > benefit more than other programs from its rather > limited opening book repeating won lines many > times in a match thus sometimes producing doubles. > Regards > Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] I did not know that opening book help Junior so much. I knew that fruit performed clearly better than Junior also when own books were used see http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?460698 I did not follow the games to check for doubles but I remember matches when Fruit beated Fritz9 or Shredder9 convincingly when original opening book were used and the result of the ssdf are surprising. Maybe Fruit does not like the athlon1200 and it may be interesting to know if it earns more speed from faster hardware relative to Fritz or Junior or Shredder. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.