Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:27:42 11/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2005 at 02:51:20, George Speight wrote: >On November 11, 2005 at 14:21:53, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On November 11, 2005 at 07:33:15, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>This is stunning, when other testers have reported normally Fruit - Junior >>>to about 70 - 30. >> >>There is nothing surprising about it. >> >>Kasparov doesn't win every game either. >> >>Several thousand years ago, somebody said this: >>(Ecclesiastes 9:11) I returned to see under the sun that the swift do not have >>the race, nor the mighty ones the battle, nor do the wise also have the food, >>nor do the understanding ones also have the riches, nor do even those having >>knowledge have the favor; because time and unforeseen occurrence befall them >>all. >> >>It's still true today. >Different testing , different conditions, I am not at all surprised that things >are starting to change in Fruit's matches. It is very strong, but i could see >this coming a mile away. I've run Fritz 9 ag. Fruit in similar conditions. No >surprise here! Regards, George I remember reading convincing score for Fruit2.2 against Fritz9 with own books including learning(28-14 and later fritz could only reduce the gap to 31.5-18.5). Unfortunately I did not save the relevant post but I am sure that other people also remember it. It may be interesting to know what is the difference between the conditions in that match and the conditions in your Fruit-Fritz9 match? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.