Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:20:07 11/12/05
Over at CSS, the latest results of CEGT were shown with both Fruit 2.2 and Fruit 2.2.1 having achieved the exact same rating. The poster concluded this reflected the myth that TBs added strength, whereas the ratings proved otherwise. I view it differently of course. What *can* be concluded is that the speed lost searching the TBs on the HD is compensated by the knowledge brought. The biggest problem is of course the time the engine loses when searching the HD. I would like to know if any results exist where the entire 5-man TB were placed in the RAM and then comparative results produced with and without TBs. Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.