Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: OK, computers are stupid but humans too? Zappa-The King

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 10:12:45 11/12/05

Go up one level in this thread


I believe (from memory), some computer chess tournaments won't allow operators
to offer draws or accept draw offers on behalf of the engine. However, this
seems not the case for the Leiden tournament. From
http://www.computerschaak.nl/rulesuk.html:

ad art. 5: The end of a game
The operator has the right to resign a game, offer a draw or accept an offered
draw on behalf of the computer. If a game is stopped in this way, the arbiter
can still decide that the game must be resumed. Claims for a draw based on art.
9.2 (repetition) or 9.3 (50-moves) must be made by the computer itself.

Some strange things happen in computer chess: in dead draw position, one engine
might think, it has an advantage (which it really might have, but not enough to
win). This engine might give away its advantange in small step - until the
position is lost. IMHO, it is part of the game. In the Paderborn tournament 3
(?) years ago, Yace could win against Shredder because of this (Shredder tried
hard, to avoid draw by repetition).

I think, especially in computer chess, it won't hurt, to do play until the end.

Regards,
Dieter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.