Author: gerold daniels
Date: 16:20:58 11/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2005 at 17:39:26, Chessfun wrote: >On November 12, 2005 at 17:35:55, Jake Sisko wrote: >> >>Why list Fruit twice? > >Actually it's listed three times with 2.1, 2.2 and 2.2.1. > >But if you mean specifically why list 2.2 and 2.2.1, then simply one is without >tablebase support (2.2) the other with (2.2.1). > >Thanks > >Sarah. Interesting to see Fruit 2.2.1 holds advantive over 2.2 Gerold
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.