Author: Marc Lacrosse
Date: 16:35:17 11/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2005 at 18:04:48, Zheng Zhixian wrote: > >Hmm I see that fruit ended up 2nd unshared. So I think the correct answer is, >you guys were speculating too soon. 6th rounds in a 11th swiss and you start >talking about disappointing?? LOL. LOL ?? _Your_ comment is laughable. Not "6th rounds in a 11th swiss" but well 6th round in a 9 rounds swiss. And after these 6 rounds 2.5 points had already been lost by Fruit so that final victory was near impossible. From the presumed strongest program in the world this figure was indeed extremely disappointing to say the least. And even though Fruit managed to finish second after that, the way these points had been lost remains questioning. In my opinion this was related to inadequate opening preparation and I intended to discuss and analyse this in the thread. But i see that analysing is not your point. It's easyer to put a factual error in a three lines comment finishing with "LOL"... Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.