Author: chandler yergin
Date: 17:30:30 11/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 13, 2005 at 19:36:34, Jake Sisko wrote: >On November 13, 2005 at 19:21:23, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On November 13, 2005 at 18:48:16, Jake Sisko wrote: >> >>>Match against Adams the glory can't last forever, I think hydra has to play >>>Zappa and Fruit to Prove it's the strongest Chess Entity. What do others think? >> >>So by playing Zappa and Fruit, Hydra somehow proves it is the greatest chess >>entity? >> >>What about Shredder, Junior, Fritz, Hiarcs, Ferret, Crafty, and Tiger? They just >>get left out of the mix? >> >>Or it doesn't have to play Kasparov, Kramnik, Topolov, Anand, Svidler... and >>well.. the rest of the 2700+ club? >> >>If this the case and I was Hydra's team, I would take that bet any day. Just to >>be number #1 on the SSDF an engine must beat _many_ engines over _many_ games to >>get the required rating. >> >>Just because a can beat b, doesn't mean c can beat both a and b. If you throw >>d,e,f,g,h,and i into the mix, the odds decrease that one will emerge as the >>"Strongest Chess Entity", but rather just the current strongest player. >> >>Peter > > > I think it's pretty clear that Zappa and Fruit are better then the other micro >programs, The second question has also been resolved, >Hydra proved computers are better then humans Haaaa Haaaaaaaaaa I think not. so it looks like the battle lines are now drawn between >computer vs computer. Ofcourse I'm generalizing, but in this thing most of us >do.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.