Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 12:12:33 03/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 1999 at 11:36:33, Francois Bertin wrote: >On March 18, 1999 at 09:52:37, Charles Unruh wrote: > >>Shroeder says on his page that rebel 10c has less positional understanding than >>the original R10. Does he mean this for just when tiger is set on, or just >>period? If it's just period then i want the old rebel back. > > Go see the discussion on RebelBoard (www.rebel.nl/wwwboard/wwwboard.html). >Ed Schröder gives more detail there, in the thread "Chess 2010, Rebel 10b >and Rebel 10c...". Basically, in version 10c the core Rebel engine has been >modified as discussed in the "Chess 2010" article and is weaker positionally >than 10b, while being tactically stronger and searching faster, even if the >Tiger System option is not activated. > > For those who like the positional side of Rebel, Ed suggest they get back >to version 10b. > FB But my own testings showed that rebel 10c (without tiger) is slower in ply depth than rebel 10b. Try for yourself and take some positions to compare. Ernst-J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.