Author: Chessfun
Date: 16:01:09 11/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2005 at 14:56:25, Günther Simon wrote: >On November 14, 2005 at 14:31:24, Chessfun wrote: > >... >>>Hello Uri, >>>Your game has nothing to do with the topic that I can see. I just searched the >>>almost 512,000 games in the Chessbase database.cbh that came with one of the >>>programs. There is not one game with the position after 5....Qb6. You can >>>argue all you want about some people who have played that position but you >>>cannot convince me it's a good move. It may have surprise benefits if you have >>>done some home analysis or you are playing some correspondence game where you >>>have time to work out all problems or can find games already played from that >>>position to give you ideas. Obviously, Deep Sjeng had an advantage here with >>>"prior knowledge" of the position backed up by a couple more book moves. >>>Congrats to the book maker. >>>Jim >> >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?461610 >> >>Sarah. > >You missed the point. >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?461624 > >I wonder how much redundant info will still arise in this thread? As long as you count yours as one post, fine with me. >My post contained already all necessary infos about the setup flaw >and about the too short search time for such a position... >(independent from Fruit) > >Guenther I missed no point. I simply pointed Jim to the fact that engine books were not used. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.