Author: Günther Simon
Date: 20:44:34 11/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2005 at 19:01:09, Chessfun wrote: >On November 14, 2005 at 14:56:25, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On November 14, 2005 at 14:31:24, Chessfun wrote: >> >>... >>>>Hello Uri, >>>>Your game has nothing to do with the topic that I can see. I just searched the >>>>almost 512,000 games in the Chessbase database.cbh that came with one of the >>>>programs. There is not one game with the position after 5....Qb6. You can >>>>argue all you want about some people who have played that position but you >>>>cannot convince me it's a good move. It may have surprise benefits if you have >>>>done some home analysis or you are playing some correspondence game where you >>>>have time to work out all problems or can find games already played from that >>>>position to give you ideas. Obviously, Deep Sjeng had an advantage here with >>>>"prior knowledge" of the position backed up by a couple more book moves. >>>>Congrats to the book maker. >>>>Jim >>> >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?461610 >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>You missed the point. >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?461624 >> >>I wonder how much redundant info will still arise in this thread? > >As long as you count yours as one post, fine with me. > >>My post contained already all necessary infos about the setup flaw >>and about the too short search time for such a position... >>(independent from Fruit) >> >>Guenther > >I missed no point. I simply pointed Jim to the fact that engine books were not >used. > >Sarah. And what is the meaning of telling him something he knew already? What has it to do with the fact that the used a wrong book setup at all? ? Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.