Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:53:10 11/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2005 at 00:04:18, Tony Nichols wrote: >On November 14, 2005 at 20:32:22, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2738 > >I hope Topalov does not go the way of Ponomariov. Big matches do not come your >way everyday. >Regards >Tony I think that topalov is right not to accept a match against Kramnik but it could be better if topalov say that it is not a question of money but a question of justice. Kramnik does not deserve a match beacuse Shirov beated him so I do not count Kramnik's match against kasparov(kramnik should never be there in the first place) and I think that kramnik never was the world champion. Accepting a match against kramnik is simply against justice and I hope people simply forget about kramnik(kramnik is simply too greedy and this is the reason he refused to participate in the world championship that topalov won so I hope that he earns nothing). Based on what I read, Kramnik got money for losing against shirov when shirov never got money for winning because the prize was supposed to be a match against kasparov. This is clearly not fair and I think that justice says that Kramnik should pay shirov at least the money that kramnik got for losing the match as compensation because it is not logical that losing is better than winning and shirov could win that money in case of losing the match against kramnik. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.